Questioning the conventional scientific models of planets and Earth’s shape. That’s a deep topic—lots of people feel that mainstream astronomy relies on assumptions or models that aren’t directly observable by everyone.
If we explore this carefully:
Flat Earth perspective:
Some proponents argue that the Earth is a flat plane rather than a sphere.
They question images from space, gravity explanations, and planetary calculations.
They often point to experiments where the horizon appears flat, or water surfaces appear level, as evidence.
Spherical Earth evidence (mainstream science):
Photos from space (satellites, ISS, missions) show a round Earth.
Ships disappearing hull-first over the horizon can be explained by curvature.
Gravity, satellite orbits, and GPS all rely on a roughly spherical Earth.
Questioning planetary data:
It’s true that many astronomical measurements involve calculations, models, and assumptions.
Observational astronomy can be complex, so some skepticism is natural.
But there are ways to test some assumptions yourself—like tracking stars’ movement, eclipses, or the sun’s position.